|
ENLACES

Enlaces sugeridos a los interesados en la temática "Evaluación del e-Gobierno” (*)
A Quality Model of e-Government Services Based on the ISO/IEC 9126 Standard http://www.sit.kmutt.ac.th/wichian/Paper/eGovServiceQualityModel.pdf
An evaluation framework for data quality tools (Practice Oriented) http://mitiq.mit.edu/iciq/PDF/AN%20EVALUATION%20FRAMEWORK%20FOR%20DATA%20QUALITY%20TOOLS.pdf
Australia. Australian National Audit Office: Measuring the Efficiency and Effectiveness of e-Government. Australia http://www.anao.gov.au/uploads/documents/2004-05_Audit_Report_26.pdf
Australia. Australian National Audit Office: Quality Internet Services for Government Clients—Monitoring and Evaluation by Government Agencies. Australian National Audit Office. 2003 http://www.anao.gov.au/uploads/documents/2003-04_Audit_Report_30.pdf
Australia. Department of Finance and Deregulation: Better Practice Checklists & Guides. Australia http://www.finance.gov.au/e-government/better-practice-and-collaboration/better-practice-checklists/index.html
Banco MundiaL: Strategies Monitoring and Evaluation Toolkit. Reviews some 50 e-Strategies. Presents a framework for integrating monitoring and evaluation (M&E) into e-Strategies. WorldBank. 2005 http://egov.sonasi.com/repository/e-strategies-monitoring-and-evaluation-toolkit/download
Bridges (Ciudad del Cabo. Sudáfrica): Provincial Government of the Western Cape: Cape Gateway Project Evaluation. 2003 http://egov.sonasi.com/repository/provincial-government-of-the-western-cape-cape-gateway-project-evaluation/downloadR
Brunel University, UK. Dept of Information Systems and Computing: Evaluating Global e-Government Sites: A View using Web Diagnostic Tools Jyoti Choudrie, Gheorgita Ghinea and Vishanth Weerakkody DISC, Brunel University, Uxbridge, UK. 2003 http://www.ejeg.com/volume-2/volume2-issue2/v2-i2-choudrie-pp105-114.pdf
¿Cómo evaluar programas y servicios públicos?: Aproximación sistemática y estudios de caso. Xavier Ballart http://books.google.es/books?id=HEAfcrVGjZoC&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_v2_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false
e-Government Economics Project (eGEP). Released in March 2006 http://217.59.60.50/eGEP/Static/Contents/last/D.2.4_Measurement_Framework_draft_final_version.pdf
e-User: Public Online Services and User Orientation. Evidence-based support for the design and delivery of user-centred online public services http://www.euser-eu.org/Default.asp?MenuID=8
Estados Unidos (USA). Congressional Research Service: State e-Government Strategies: Identifying Best Practices and Applications. July 23, 2007 http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/secrecy/RL34104.pdf Estados Unidos (USA). Executive Office of the President: Report to Congress on the benefits of the President’s e-Government initiatives http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/inforeg/e-gov/e-gov_benefits_report_2006.pdf
InfoDev: Introduction to e-Government. Theme III: Management and implementation of e-Government Projects. Chapter 10: Monitoring and Evaluation. InfoDev toolkit. 2008 http://www.egov.infodev.org/en/Section.110.html
Instituto Centroamericano de Administración de Empresas (INCAE): Herramienta para la Evaluación de la Calidad de la Prestación de Servicios por Medios Digitales http://www.scribd.com/doc/8630733/Herramienta-Para-La-Evaluacion-de-La-Calidad-de-La-Prestacion-de-Servicios-Por-Medios -Digitales
Kunstelj, M. & Vintar, M. (2004): “Evaluating the progress of e-Government development: critical analysis of current approaches”. Documento presentado en el Congrés Annual delEuropean Group of Public Administration (EGPA). Ljubljana, 1-4 setembre. http://fu.uni-lj.si/egpa2004/html/sg1/Kunstelj_Vintar.pdf
London School of Economics. Department of Information Systems: Evaluating the Development Impact of e-Governance Initiatives: An Exploratory Framework http://egov.sonasi.com/repository/evaluating-the-development-impact-of-e-governance-initiatives-an-exploratory-framework/download
Naciones Unidas. CEPAL: Gil-García, R., Luna Reyes, L.F. & Moreno Escobar, H. (2007) “Modelo Multi-dimensional de medición del Gobierno Electrónico para América Latina y el Caribe”. CEPAL. Colección Documentos de Proyectos. Naciones Unidas. Chile. http://www.eclac.org/ddpe/publicaciones/xml/6/28646/W124.pdf
Naciones Unidas.UNDESA/DPADM: United Nations e-Government Survey 2010 http://www2.unpan.org/egovkb/global_reports/10report.htm
Naciones Unidas. UNPAN: Benchmarking e-Government: A Global Perspective http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/UN/UNPAN021547.pdf#search=%22benchmarking%20e-government%22
Naciones Unidas. UNPAN; Gobierno de Brasil: e-Government – Realising the Benefits of Information Technologies and Improving Public Services Delivering. Ceres Alves Prates. Secretary for Management. Ministry of Planning, Budget and Management. Government of Brazil http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/un/unpan001040.pdf
Practicing e-Government: a global perspective. Mehdi Khosrowpour http://books.google.com/books?hl=fr&lr=&id=JUtqErI5ZNEC&oi=fnd&pg=PR6&dq=Citizen+Participation+in+Public+Administration:+The+Impact+of +Hein+van+Duivenboden+Citizen+Oriented+Public+Services+on+Government+and+Citizen&ots=hG2tFJb_B7&sig= Z3IbFGv-FMQ4J7zQ061sD48DprU#v=onepage&q=Citizen%20Participation%20in%20Public%20Administration%3A%20The%20Impact%20of%20Hein%20van%20Duivenboden%20Citizen%20Oriented%20Public%20Services%20on%20Government%20and%20Citizen&f=false
Prioritization of e-Government strategies using a SWOT-AHP analysis: the case of Turkey. Cengiz Kahraman1, Nihan Çetin Demirel2 and Tufan Demirel2 http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ejis/journal/v16/n3/full/3000679a.html
Rambøll Management (Dinamarca): Top of the Web: User Satisfaction and Usage of e-Government Services. 2004 http://www.eprocnet.gov.ie/other-documents/topofthewebsurveyresults.pdf/
Rand Europe: Benchmarking e-Government in Europe and the US. Rand Europe. Irma Graafland-Essers and Emile Ettedgui. 2003 http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1733/MR1733.pdf
The Communications Network: Are we there yet? A communications evaluation guide. The communications network strengthening the voice of philanthropy. 2008 http://www.comnetwork.org/resources/downloads/AreWeThereYet.pdf
The London School of Economics and Political Science (UK): New Public Management Is Dead—Long Live Digital-Era Governance. Dunleavy, P. , Margetts, H., Bastow S., and Tinkler, J. (2006). Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory Advance Access published on July 1, 2006, DOI 10.1093/jopart/mui057. J Public Adm Res Theory 16: 467-494. http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/EDSInnovationResearchProgramme/pdf/EDSdp004.pdf
Unión Europea: User satisfaction and administrative simplification within the perspective of eGovernment impact: Two faces of the same coin? Unión Europea. 2008 http://www.epractice.eu/files/4.5.pdf
Universidad de Zürich. Institut für Informatik (IFI) Design Principles for e-Government Services. Reinhard Riedl http://www.ifi.uzh.ch/egov/Wien03.pdf
University of Manchester, UK: Understanding and Measuring eGovernment: International Benchmarking Studies. Richard Heeks. Development Informatics Group. IDPM, University of Manchester, UK. 2006 http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/UN/UNPAN023686.pdf
Nota: Invitamos a todos los lectores a sugerirnos la inclusión de recursos y a avisarnos en caso de que alguno de los vínculos publicados se hallara dañado. Con esta colaboración podremos ofrecer un mejor material. Dirigir sus sugerencias y avisos a: Javier Sáenz Coré <jsaenzcore@gmail.com>
(*) El correcto funcionamiento de los URL indicados en cada una de las referencias de esta sección fue verificado entre los días 25 y 29/05/2010.
|